ALN Apartment Data, Inc. (Continued on next page)

Transcript

1 AK - Anchorage 90.7% 89.3% % $1,025 $1, % 90.7% 89.3% % $1,025 $1, % AK - Misc. AK 87.3% 81.9% % $1,206 $1, % 87.3% 81.9% % $1,206 $1, % Alaska Average 91.7% 87.4% % $1,265 $1, % 91.7% 87.4% % $1,265 $1, % AL - Birmingham 91.4% 92.7% % $861 $ % 91.9% 93.1% % $857 $ % AL - Huntsville 93.5% 94.2% % $707 $ % 93.5% 94.2% % $707 $ % AL - Misc. AL 93.0% 94.9% % $638 $ % 93.0% 94.9% % $638 $ % AL - Mobile 88.3% 89.8% % $783 $ % 89.6% 90.6% % $778 $ % AL - Montgomery 87.6% 89.8% % $744 $ % 87.6% 89.8% % $744 $ % Alabama Average 91.0% 91.8% % $784 $ % 91.5% 92.6% % $781 $ % AR - Little Rock 90.1% 89.8% % $726 $ % 90.6% 90.7% % $721 $ % AR - Misc. AR 93.3% 93.1% % $562 $ % 93.3% 93.1% % $562 $ % AR - Northwest Arkansas 89.8% 91.9% % $649 $ % 95.2% 95.9% % $621 $ % Arkansas Average 90.3% 90.8% % $682 $ % 92.1% 92.5% % $669 $ % AZ - Flagstaff 95.1% 93.2% % $1,277 $1, % 95.1% 93.2% % $1,277 $1, % AZ - Misc. AZ 94.3% 95.8% % $743 $ % 94.3% 95.8% % $743 $ % AZ - Phoenix 92.0% 92.8% % $1,008 $1, % 94.3% 94.6% % $997 $1, % AZ - Tucson 93.1% 94.2% % $731 $ % 93.1% 94.2% % $731 $ % Arizona Average 92.3% 92.9% % $960 $1, % 94.1% 94.6% % $950 $1, % CA - Central Coast 95.9% 96.2% % $1,831 $1, % 96.0% 96.3% % $1,828 $1, % CA - Los Angeles/OC 93.4% 93.3% % $2,095 $2, % 95.6% 95.7% % $2,075 $2, % CA - Misc. CA 96.1% 98.9% % $966 $ % 96.1% 99.5% % $966 $ % CA - Sacramento 95.7% 95.4% % $1,335 $1, % 96.0% 96.2% % $1,331 $1, % CA - San Bernardino/Riverside 95.1% 94.6% % $1,439 $1, % 95.3% 95.6% % $1,437 $1, % CA - San Diego 94.3% 93.8% % $1,814 $1, % 95.7% 95.6% % $1,803 $1, % CA - San Francisco/Oakland 92.9% 93.8% % $2,607 $2, % 95.0% 95.2% % $2,589 $2, % CA - San Joaquin Valley 96.0% 96.7% % $1,018 $1, % 96.1% 96.7% % $1,016 $1, % California Average 94.0% 94.1% % $1,965 $2, % 95.5% 95.7% % $1,948 $2, % CO - Denver/Co Springs 90.5% 91.3% % $1,360 $1, % 94.0% 94.1% % $1,339 $1, % CO - Misc. CO 96.7% 93.4% % $1,041 $1, % 96.7% 96.9% % $1,041 $1, % Colorado Average 90.5% 91.3% % $1,357 $1, % 94.0% 94.1% % $1,335 $1, % FL - Fort Lauderdale 90.8% 91.8% % $1,590 $1, % 94.4% 94.6% % $1,564 $1, % FL - Fort Myers/Naples 93.9% 91.1% % $1,272 $1, % 94.4% 94.0% % $1,271 $1, % FL - Gainesville 96.0% 95.0% % $1,129 $1, % 97.0% 96.3% % $1,122 $1, % FL - Jacksonville 92.9% 90.3% % $1,001 $1, % 94.2% 93.7% % $996 $1, % FL - Melbourne 95.9% 92.5% % $1,061 $1, % 96.1% 94.4% % $1,059 $1, % FL - Miami 87.4% 90.8% % $1,667 $1, % 94.5% 95.0% % $1,604 $1, % FL - Orlando 92.3% 92.7% % $1,219 $1, % 95.2% 95.1% % $1,212 $1, % FL - Palm Beach 88.2% 92.1% % $1,582 $1, % 92.6% 94.5% % $1,552 $1, % FL - Pensacola 91.1% 94.3% % $990 $1, % 93.1% 94.7% % $978 $1, % FL - Tallahassee 87.8% 92.9% % $911 $ % 91.2% 93.3% % $904 $ % FL - Tampa 91.4% 91.6% % $1,150 $1, % 94.4% 94.4% 0 0.0% $1,130 $1, % Florida Average 91.4% 91.9% % $1,261 $1, % 94.5% 94.6% % $1,237 $1, % GA - Albany 91.8% 90.8% % $670 $ % 91.8% 90.8% % $670 $ % GA - Atlanta 91.2% 91.9% % $1,145 $1, % 93.0% 93.5% % $1,126 $1, % GA - Augusta 90.9% 87.3% % $794 $ % 92.5% 90.3% % $788 $ % GA - Columbus 93.4% 93.7% % $810 $ % 94.3% 93.6% % $806 $ % GA - Macon 93.1% 93.4% % $774 $ % 94.0% 93.6% % $769 $ % GA - Savannah 89.9% 91.8% % $985 $1, % 93.5% 93.7% % $964 $1, % Georgia Average 91.2% 91.8% % $1,087 $1, % 93.1% 93.3% % $1,069 $1, % IA - Des Moines 90.3% 89.3% % $869 $ % 92.7% 92.5% % $853 $ % IA - Misc. IA 95.5% 91.0% % $747 $ % 95.5% 96.0% % $747 $ % Iowa Average 90.6% 89.4% % $860 $ % 92.9% 92.7% % $845 $ % ID - Boise 91.9% 94.8% % $972 $1, % 94.5% 95.9% % $955 $1, % ID - Misc. ID 77.8% 98.8% % $747 $ % 95.1% 98.8% % $724 $ % Idaho Average 91.0% 95.1% % $955 $1, % 94.5% 96.1% % $938 $ % IL - Chicago 89.7% 89.9% % $1,474 $1, % 92.4% 93.3% % $1,443 $1, % IL - Misc. IL 82.6% 76.0% % $661 $ % 82.6% 76.0% % $661 $ % IL - Moline 93.8% 92.2% % $732 $ % 93.8% 95.8% % $732 $ % IL - Springfield 91.2% 90.4% % $719 $ % 91.2% 90.4% % $719 $ % Illinois Average 89.9% 89.6% % $1,381 $1, % 92.3% 93.1% % $1,350 $1, % IN - Evansville 88.5% 92.6% % $717 $ % 92.4% 93.3% % $707 $ % IN - Fort Wayne 93.6% 92.3% % $724 $ % 93.6% 92.3% % $724 $ % IN - Indianapolis 91.3% 91.4% % $842 $ % 92.5% 92.8% % $834 $ % IN - Misc. IN 89.2% 96.1% % $766 $ % 89.2% 96.1% % $766 $ % IN - South Bend 93.0% 92.9% % $799 $ % 94.3% 94.7% % $799 $ % Indiana Average 91.5% 91.7% % $818 $ % 92.7% 92.9% % $812 $ %

2 KS - Misc. KS 96.1% 96.9% % $523 $ % 96.1% 96.9% % $523 $ % KS - Topeka/Manhattan/Lawrence 88.8% 91.0% % $734 $ % 92.4% 91.5% % $729 $ % KS - Wichita 90.9% 91.8% % $634 $ % 90.9% 92.2% % $634 $ % Kansas Average 90.1% 91.6% % $674 $ % 91.6% 92.0% % $670 $ % KY - Lexington 91.2% 92.1% % $787 $ % 91.9% 92.2% % $774 $ % KY - Louisville 90.6% 91.2% % $862 $ % 93.5% 93.1% % $843 $ % KY - Misc. KY 92.4% 95.0% % $601 $ % 92.4% 95.0% % $601 $ % Kentucky Average 90.8% 91.6% % $832 $ % 93.0% 92.9% % $815 $ % LA - Baton Rouge 86.2% 85.0% % $891 $ % 88.7% 87.4% % $874 $ % LA - Lake Charles 87.9% 87.9% 0-0.1% $985 $ % 91.4% 88.7% % $971 $ % LA - Misc. LA 86.5% 90.3% % $749 $ % 86.5% 90.3% % $749 $ % LA - Monroe 89.4% 89.0% % $730 $ % 89.4% 89.0% % $730 $ % LA - New Orleans 92.4% 91.7% % $958 $ % 92.6% 92.7% % $953 $ % LA - Shreveport 88.9% 89.8% % $778 $ % 88.9% 90.1% % $778 $ % Louisiana Average 88.9% 88.5% % $895 $ % 90.1% 89.9% % $886 $ % MA - Boston 89.3% 93.3% % $2,085 $2, % 95.0% 96.0% % $2,048 $2, % MA - Springfield 97.5% 97.8% % $1,121 $1, % 97.5% 97.8% % $1,121 $1, % Massachusetts Average 89.7% 93.5% % $2,033 $2, % 95.2% 96.1% % $1,994 $2, % MD - Baltimore 91.4% 93.2% % $1,289 $1, % 93.5% 94.1% % $1,275 $1, % MD - Misc. MD 94.8% 96.1% % $1,002 $1, % 97.3% 96.6% % $994 $1, % Maryland Average 91.5% 93.3% % $1,283 $1, % 93.5% 94.2% % $1,269 $1, % ME - Augusta/Portland 94.4% 96.4% % $1,267 $1, % 96.6% 96.2% % $1,256 $1, % ME - Misc. ME 92.0% 98.9% % $753 $ % 92.0% 98.9% % $753 $ % Maine Average 94.1% 96.5% % $1,207 $1, % 96.1% 96.3% % $1,197 $1, % MI - Detroit 95.4% 94.7% % $948 $ % 95.6% 95.3% % $946 $ % MI - Grand Rapids/Kalamazoo/Battle Creek 92.9% 93.5% % $838 $ % 94.9% 95.3% % $831 $ % MI - Misc. MI 93.1% 94.4% % $807 $ % 93.1% 94.4% % $807 $ % Michigan Average 94.7% 94.4% % $921 $ % 95.4% 95.3% % $918 $ % MN - Minneapolis - St. Paul 94.6% 95.0% % $1,213 $1, % 96.2% 96.3% % $1,203 $1, % MN - Misc. MN 95.4% 94.5% % $988 $1, % 95.4% 97.0% % $988 $ % Minnesota Average 94.6% 95.0% % $1,207 $1, % 96.2% 96.3% % $1,198 $1, % MO - Columbia 93.8% 93.2% % $663 $ % 93.8% 93.2% % $663 $ % MO - Kansas City 90.8% 91.1% % $942 $ % 93.5% 93.8% % $923 $ % MO - Misc. MO 94.3% 95.6% % $713 $ % 94.3% 95.6% % $713 $ % MO - Springfield 94.4% 94.7% % $687 $ % 94.4% 95.8% % $687 $ % MO - St. Louis 89.7% 90.7% % $915 $ % 91.7% 92.2% % $894 $ % Missouri Average 90.4% 91.2% % $906 $ % 92.8% 93.3% % $887 $ % MS - Gulfport/Biloxi 90.1% 92.9% % $724 $ % 90.1% 92.9% % $724 $ % MS - Jackson/Central MS 91.0% 92.9% % $815 $ % 91.0% 92.9% % $815 $ % MS - Misc. MS 89.6% 90.3% % $800 $ % 92.1% 91.5% % $793 $ % Mississippi Average 90.4% 92.3% % $788 $ % 91.1% 92.6% % $786 $ % NC - Asheville 87.2% 90.3% % $1,113 $1, % 94.3% 94.8% % $1,102 $1, % NC - Charlotte 89.7% 90.9% % $1,060 $1, % 93.8% 94.4% % $1,042 $1, % NC - Fayetteville 91.1% 93.4% % $785 $ % 91.5% 93.7% % $784 $ % NC - Greensboro/Winston-Salem 91.5% 92.7% % $772 $ % 92.8% 93.7% % $766 $ % NC - Misc. NC 95.4% 96.6% % $941 $1, % 95.4% 97.7% % $941 $1, % NC - Raleigh-Durham 90.2% 91.5% % $1,044 $1, % 93.4% 94.3% % $1,031 $1, % NC - Wilmington 91.6% 94.9% % $894 $ % 92.8% 95.0% % $879 $ % North Carolina Average 90.2% 91.6% % $988 $1, % 93.3% 94.3% % $973 $1, % ND - Bismarck 83.5% 94.4% % $889 $ % 83.5% 94.4% % $889 $ % ND - Fargo 89.3% 91.9% % $767 $ % 89.3% 91.9% % $766 $ % ND - Misc. ND 89.2% 93.1% % $912 $1, % 89.2% 93.1% % $912 $1, % North Dakota Average 88.4% 92.8% % $838 $ % 88.5% 92.8% % $838 $ % NE - Lincoln 96.4% 93.3% % $826 $ % 96.4% 94.9% % $826 $ % NE - Misc. NE 96.0% 89.3% % $697 $ % 96.0% 89.3% % $697 $ % NE - Omaha 92.3% 91.6% % $899 $ % 94.8% 94.8% 0 0.0% $894 $ % Nebraska Average 92.6% 91.9% % $878 $ % 95.2% 94.8% % $874 $ % NM - Albuquerque 93.1% 94.2% % $823 $ % 93.6% 94.2% % $821 $ % NM - Misc. NM 91.8% 87.9% % $915 $1, % 95.2% 94.9% % $911 $ % New Mexico Average 93.0% 93.8% % $831 $ % 93.7% 94.3% % $829 $ % NV - Las Vegas 92.3% 93.6% % $965 $1, % 93.5% 94.1% % $959 $1, % NV - Misc. NV 91.5% 95.3% % $1,050 $ % 91.5% 95.3% % $1,050 $ % NV - Reno 95.5% 93.3% % $1,152 $1, % 95.5% 96.1% % $1,152 $1, % Nevada Average 92.8% 93.6% % $995 $1, % 93.8% 94.4% % $991 $1, %

3 Partner with a data provider who uses your level of success as the measure of our own. Comprehensive analysis and multifamily research from a name you can trust. Nationwide Multifamily Data ext. 3 Let s Schedule a Webinar (Continue on for Market Stats)

4 NY - Albany 90.8% 93.3% % $1,154 $1, % 93.8% 94.7% % $1,131 $1, % NY - Buffalo/Rochester/Syracuse 94.1% 94.9% % $944 $ % 94.8% 95.1% % $942 $ % NY - Misc. NY 88.9% 86.8% % $976 $ % 88.9% 86.8% % $976 $ % NY - New York City 91.2% 92.6% % $2,470 $2, % 95.0% 95.6% % $2,443 $2, % New York Average 90.7% 92.0% % $2,168 $2, % 94.7% 95.4% % $2,140 $2, % OH - Cincinnati/Dayton 91.9% 93.7% % $871 $ % 93.9% 94.9% % $856 $ % OH - Cleveland/Akron 93.7% 93.3% % $831 $ % 94.4% 94.3% % $827 $ % OH - Columbus 93.0% 92.1% % $907 $ % 94.5% 94.4% % $901 $ % OH - Misc. OH 97.4% 98.9% % $670 $ % 97.4% 98.9% % $670 $ % OH - Toledo 94.1% 94.7% % $696 $ % 94.9% 94.6% % $695 $ % Ohio Average 92.9% 93.0% % $860 $ % 94.3% 94.5% % $852 $ % OK - Misc. OK 92.7% 90.6% % $666 $ % 92.7% 90.6% % $666 $ % OK - Oklahoma City 88.3% 88.4% % $719 $ % 89.1% 89.6% % $713 $ % OK - Tulsa 89.1% 91.1% % $677 $ % 90.3% 91.4% % $669 $ % Oklahoma Average 88.7% 89.5% % $702 $ % 89.6% 90.4% % $695 $ % OR - Misc. OR 98.4% 82.2% % $979 $1, % 98.4% 97.9% % $979 $1, % OR - Portland 92.7% 93.6% % $1,307 $1, % 94.6% 94.9% % $1,294 $1, % Oregon Average 92.7% 93.3% % $1,304 $1, % 94.7% 94.9% % $1,291 $1, % PA - Harrisburg/Lancaster 95.4% 95.0% % $1,030 $1, % 95.6% 96.0% % $1,030 $1, % PA - Misc. PA 95.7% 93.9% % $983 $ % 95.7% 93.9% % $983 $ % PA - Philadelphia 93.2% 93.9% % $1,280 $1, % 94.5% 95.2% % $1,264 $1, % PA - Pittsburgh 90.4% 92.9% % $1,063 $1, % 93.4% 94.6% % $1,048 $1, % PA - State College/Altoona 98.1% 94.5% % $1,173 $1, % 98.1% 94.5% % $1,173 $1, % Pennsylvania Average 93.1% 93.9% % $1,214 $1, % 94.5% 95.2% % $1,201 $1, % SC - Charleston 84.0% 87.1% % $1,149 $1, % 92.0% 91.9% % $1,111 $1, % SC - Columbia 90.8% 90.5% % $886 $ % 92.4% 92.4% 0 0.0% $884 $ % SC - Greenville-Spartanburg 90.7% 92.4% % $889 $ % 93.1% 93.3% % $880 $ % SC - Misc. SC 93.2% 93.8% % $743 $ % 93.2% 93.8% % $743 $ % SC - Myrtle Beach 85.2% 92.4% % $955 $1, % 92.5% 92.7% % $947 $ % South Carolina Average 88.1% 89.9% % $974 $1, % 92.5% 92.6% % $954 $ % SD - Misc. SD 95.6% 90.6% % $841 $ % 95.6% 97.0% % $841 $ % SD - Rapid City 94.3% 96.9% % $878 $ % 95.7% 97.2% % $876 $ % SD - Sioux Falls 83.8% 88.0% % $797 $ % 86.9% 92.7% % $785 $ % South Dakota Average 87.6% 90.0% % $821 $ % 90.0% 94.0% % $813 $ % TN - Chattanooga 91.7% 90.0% % $875 $ % 94.1% 94.7% % $867 $ % TN - Knoxville 94.7% 90.2% % $874 $ % 95.9% 94.6% % $872 $ % TN - Memphis 91.3% 90.3% % $799 $ % 91.3% 90.5% % $799 $ % TN - Misc. TN 93.6% 94.4% % $714 $ % 94.4% 95.4% % $707 $ % TN - Nashville 89.4% 91.5% % $1,150 $1, % 93.7% 94.2% % $1,098 $1, % Tennessee Average 90.8% 91.0% % $977 $1, % 93.2% 93.1% % $948 $ % TX - Dallas/Ft. Worth 90.8% 90.5% % $1,103 $1, % 93.4% 93.2% % $1,084 $1, % TX - Greater Dallas 90.4% 90.4% 0 0.0% $1,143 $1, % 93.3% 93.0% % $1,123 $1, % TX - Greater Fort Worth 91.6% 90.6% % $1,016 $1, % 93.7% 93.6% % $1,002 $1, % TX - Abilene 90.2% 91.9% % $709 $ % 90.2% 91.9% % $709 $ % TX - Amarillo 86.9% 88.2% % $709 $ % 87.3% 88.0% % $707 $ % TX - Austin 89.8% 91.4% % $1,192 $1, % 92.8% 94.1% % $1,184 $1, % TX - Beaumont 89.3% 88.9% % $836 $ % 89.3% 88.9% % $836 $ % TX - College Station 81.2% 83.8% % $1,221 $1, % 88.7% 87.6% % $1,153 $1, % TX - Corpus Christi 88.3% 89.6% % $928 $ % 89.4% 89.6% % $914 $ % TX - El Paso 91.0% 91.5% % $751 $ % 91.7% 91.6% % $751 $ % TX - Harlingen 88.6% 90.0% % $759 $ % 91.1% 91.7% % $744 $ % TX - Houston 89.5% 89.8% % $1,057 $1, % 91.1% 90.7% % $1,039 $1, % TX - Laredo 93.3% 93.8% % $853 $ % 93.3% 93.8% % $853 $ % TX - Longview/Tyler 91.8% 91.2% % $796 $ % 92.2% 92.7% % $794 $ % TX - Lubbock 90.2% 87.7% % $735 $ % 90.4% 88.8% % $733 $ % TX - Lufkin 90.3% 91.6% % $741 $ % 90.3% 91.6% % $741 $ % TX - Midland-Odessa 94.6% 92.9% % $1,292 $1, % 96.1% 95.3% % $1,293 $1, % TX - Misc. TX 92.5% 92.0% % $652 $ % 92.5% 93.2% % $652 $ % TX - San Angelo 93.2% 94.9% % $790 $ % 93.2% 94.9% % $790 $ % TX - San Antonio 87.7% 89.5% % $947 $ % 90.9% 91.6% % $932 $ % TX - Texarkana 90.7% 91.8% % $653 $ % 90.7% 91.8% % $653 $ % TX - Victoria 94.0% 93.3% % $842 $ % 94.0% 93.3% % $842 $ % TX - Waco/Temple/Killeen 87.3% 91.6% % $757 $ % 91.4% 92.4% % $744 $ % TX - Wichita Falls 87.4% 89.0% % $648 $ % 87.4% 89.0% % $648 $ % Texas Average 89.8% 90.2% % $1,047 $1, % 92.1% 92.1% 0 0.0% $1,031 $1, %

5 VA - Norfolk 92.0% 93.9% % $1,056 $1, % 92.7% 94.6% % $1,055 $1, % VA - Richmond 94.8% 93.6% % $1,068 $1, % 95.3% 95.2% % $1,065 $1, % VA - Roanoke 94.1% 95.0% % $816 $ % 94.1% 96.1% % $816 $ % Virginia Average 93.3% 93.8% % $1,039 $1, % 93.9% 94.9% % $1,037 $1, % WA - Misc. WA 85.4% 84.7% % $989 $1, % 85.4% 84.7% % $989 $1, % WA - SE Washington 96.1% 91.7% % $947 $ % 96.1% 95.5% % $947 $ % WA - Seattle 92.5% 92.5% 0 0.1% $1,644 $1, % 94.4% 94.9% % $1,615 $1, % WA - Spokane 94.9% 95.2% % $913 $ % 94.9% 95.2% % $913 $ % Washington Average 92.7% 92.6% % $1,557 $1, % 94.4% 94.9% % $1,530 $1, % WI - Green Bay/Appleton/Oshkosh 97.7% 96.6% % $715 $ % 97.7% 98.5% % $715 $ % WI - Madison 94.2% 94.6% % $1,047 $1, % 96.8% 97.4% % $1,036 $1, % WI - Milwaukee 93.2% 92.2% % $1,043 $1, % 94.7% 96.1% % $1,031 $1, % WI - Misc. WI 95.9% 96.7% % $712 $ % 95.9% 97.3% % $712 $ % Wisconsin Average 94.1% 93.7% % $976 $1, % 95.8% 96.9% % $965 $ % WV - Charleston 95.7% 93.7% % $791 $ % 95.7% 93.7% % $791 $ % WV - Miscellaneous 97.1% 95.2% % $761 $ % 97.1% 95.2% % $761 $ % West Virginia Average 96.0% 94.1% % $784 $ % 96.0% 94.1% % $784 $ % CT - Hartford 92.9% 93.0% % $1,272 $1, % 94.1% 94.4% % $1,268 $1, % DC - Washington 92.5% 93.3% % $1,727 $1, % 94.5% 94.9% % $1,709 $1, % DE - Miscellaneous 95.2% 91.4% % $1,090 $1, % 95.2% 91.4% % $1,090 $1, % HI - Honolulu 87.1% 93.1% % $1,788 $1, % 94.7% 95.0% % $1,789 $1, % MT - All of Montana 93.4% 96.6% % $891 $ % 93.4% 96.6% % $891 $ % NH - Concord 98.3% 99.4% % $1,179 $1, % 98.3% 99.4% % $1,179 $1, % RI - Providence 92.6% 96.2% % $1,408 $1, % 94.9% 96.9% % $1,392 $1, % UT - Salt Lake City 92.7% 92.1% % $1,078 $1, % 95.0% 95.0% 0 0.1% $1,064 $1, % VT - All of Vermont 84.9% 98.6% % $1,437 $1, % 87.2% 99.4% % $1,452 $1, % WY - All of Wyoming 88.4% 92.6% % $867 $ % 88.4% 92.4% % $867 $ % National Average 91.5% 92.0% % $1,252 $1, % 93.6% 94.0% % $1,236 $1, % On a monthly basis, ALN surveys all apartment communities in each of the markets that we cover and an average of 92% of these surveys are successfully completed. The above statistics reflect only Conventional, Midrise, and High-Rise apartment communities. In addition, unless otherwise noted, these statistics do not include Income Restricted, Student Housing, or Senior Independent Housing. In-depth, property level research and data is available for all property types (including Senior and Income Restricted) through ALN OnLine, which includes Market and Effective Rents, Occupancy, Floor Plan & Unit Mix information, Market & Submarket statistics, Market Surveys, Historical Trends & Customizable Reports. By using ALN OnLine, you are able to see monthly fluctuations in any submarket you need which will greatly enhance your ability to respond to changes quickly and efficiently. Disclaimer: All content and information within this review is for informational purposes only. ALN Apartment Data, Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of any information in this or any other materia posted on its site or found by following any link on its site. The owner will not be held liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. All content and information in this review may be shared provided a link to the article or page on the ALN website this review originated is included in the shared content. Laura Reese-Williams, CAS VP Business Development x 205 Laura@alndata.com Patrick Searcy, CAS Director of Marketing x 252 Patrick@alndata.com Susan Stroud, CAS Director of Sales x 207 SStroud@alndata.com Paige Kitchens, CAS x 251 Paige@alndata.com Robert Durham Account Executive x 256 Robert@alndata.com Jackie James x 253 Jackie@alndata.com Karen Nelsen x 259 KNelsen@alndata.com Mark Pennings x 232 Mark@alndata.com