La valutazione delle proposte. Il ruolo della REA. Massimo Ciscato Call Coordinator. REA/B4 Safeguarding Secure Societies. Roma, CNR, 19/05/15

Transcript

1 La valutazione delle proposte Il ruolo della REA Massimo Ciscato Call Coordinator REA/B4 Safeguarding Secure Societies Roma, CNR, 19/05/15

2 Research Executive Agency Gestione operativa di valutazioni e progetti FP7 Security Space Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions SMEs H2020 Excellent Science (MSCA, FET) Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies (Space) Societal Challenges (SC2, SC6, SC7 Secure Societies) Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation Servizi di supporto Validazione Contrattazione esperti Ecc. 2

3 Unità B4 - Safeguarding Secure Society Head of Unit: Angelo MARINO Deputy Head of Unit: Thierry BREFORT Call Coordinator Digital Security: Massimo CISCATO Call Coordinator BES-DRS-FCT: Patricio ORTIZ DE LA TORRE Competenze: Gestione di valutazioni e progetti H2020 Sfida Sociale 7* Gestione dei progetti FP7 Security* *) Esclusi progetti classificati (Decisione 2013/488/UE) 3

4 Societal Challenge 7 calls 2015 Digital Security (DS M ) Privacy, access control, trust eservices, Secure information sharing Disaster Resilient Societies (DRS M ) Crisis management and civil protection, critical infrastructure protection Fight against Crime and Terrorism (FCT M ) Forensics, law enforcement capabilities, ethical/societal dimension Border Security (BES M ) Border crossing points, information management, supply chain security 4

5 Societal Challenge 7 calls MEUR Topics Who DRS ALL 82,33 12 ALL DRS 9c & EASME DRS RTD DRS 54,33 9 REA/HOME FCT 42,16 8 REA/HOME BES 42,17 11 REA/HOME DS 50,21 4 REA/CNECT Total WP* 216,87 35 *Esclusi DRS17 e FCT 17 5

6 Publication 11/12/13 Opening 25/03/15 Info-day 26/03/15 Deadline 27/08/2015 Panel Meeting (ESR) October 2015 Ethics Screening October 2015 Evaluation in Bxl (CR) 5 23/10/15 Remote Evaluation (IER) 9/09/15 9/10/15 Security Scrutiny Nov-Dec 2014 Information to applicants + Review Jan 2016 Grant Preparation Feb-April 2016 Start of projects from May

7 Attraverso il Portale: Come fare domanda Apertura: 25/03/2015 Scadenza: 27 Agosto 2015, 17:00:00 CET 7

8 Scegliere un topic e login Pre-registrazione Formazione del consorzio Formulari amministrativi, parte B e annessi Riempimento formulari Invio 8

9 Tipi di azione Research and Innovation Action (RIA) Innovation Action (IA) Coordination and Support Action (CSA) SME Instrument Pre-Commercial Procurement Cofund (PCP) Fast Track to Innovation Pilot 9

10 You must use the official template for the part B Pay attention to: o Page limits: excess pages will be watermarked by the system and disregarded by the evaluators Part A (fill-in on-line): Sections 1 to 5 Part B (upload 2 pdf): 1- First pdf file Sections Evaluation criteria Limit: 70 pages (50 for CSAs & 90 PCP) 2- Second pdf file Sections 4-6: - Section 4: Members of the consortium - Section 5: Ethics and Societal Impact - Section 6: Security No page limit 10 10

11 Cross-cutting issues are fully integrated in the work programme (WP) Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) are integrated across all Horizon 2020 activities to successfully address European challenges Gender dimension in the content of R&I - a question on the relevance of sex/gender analysis is included in proposal templates The new strategic approach to international cooperation consists of a general opening of the WP and targeted activities across all relevant Horizon 2020 parts The approach to providing 'automatic funding' to third country participants is restricted see list of countries Other cross-cutting issues may also be included in the WP such as Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) including science education, open access to scientific publications, ethics ; standardisation; climate and sustainable development 11

12 Topic rilevanti per scienze sociali Disaster Resilience & Climate Change topic 3: Mitigating the impacts of climate change and DRS natural hazards on cultural heritage sites, structures and artefacts Critical Infrastructure Protection topic 3: Critical Infrastructure resilience indicator - analysis DRS and development of methods for assessing resilience Critical Infrastructure Protection topic 4: Protecting potentially hazardous and sensitive DRS sites/areas considering multi-sectorial dependencies Ethical/Societal Dimension topic 3: Impact of climate change in third countries on Europe's DRS security FCT Forensic topic 2: Advanced easy to use in-situ forensic tools at the scene of crime FCT Forensics topic 4: Internet Forensics to combat organized crime FCT Law Enfocement capabilities topic 5: Identity Management Ethical/Societal Dimension Topic 3: Better understanding the role of new social media FCT networks and their use for public security purposes Ethical/Societal Dimension Topic 4 - Investigating the role of social, psychological and FCT economic aspects of the processes that lead to organized crime (including cyber related offenses), terrorist networks and their impact on social cohesion Conflict prevention and peace building topic 2: Training curricula for Conflict Prevention and BES Peace Building personnel DS Value-sensitive technological innovation in Cybersecurity 12

13 Topic rilevanti per aspetti "gender" DRS DRS Crisis management topic 3: Demonstration activity on large scale disasters and crisis management and resilience of EU external assets against major identified threats or causes of crisis Crisis management topic 6: Addressing standardisation opportunities in support of increasing disaster resilience in Europe FCT FCT Forensics topic 3: Mobile, remotely controlled technologies to examine a crime scene in case of an accident or a terrorist attack involving CBRNE materials Ethical/Societal Dimension Topic 4 - Investigating the role of social, psychological and economic aspects of the processes that lead to organized crime (including cyber related offenses), terrorist networks and their impact on social cohesion 13

14 Consigli pratici Niente negoziazioni: la proposta deve essere buona così com'è Creare un consorzio intorno ad una idea e non il contrario Leggere attentamente tutta la documentazione ed in particolare il programma di lavoro e annessi Seguire rigorosamente i modelli (template) Rispettare i criteri di ammissibilità ed eligibilità Affrontare in dettaglio i criteri di valutazione 14

15 Consigli pratici Verificare attentamente il testo (proof-reading) Usare inglese corretto, semplice, chiaro e conciso Far visionare la proposta da qualcuno non direttamente coinvolto Rispettare i limiti e non aspettare l'ultimo momento per inviare la proposta! 15

16 Maggiori informazioni The Research Enquiry Service Network of National Contact Points (NCPs) Registrarsi come esperti ktop/en/experts/index.html 16