La partecipazione italiana ai bandi NMBP in Horizon2020. Luisa TONDELLI Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) Area della Ricerca di BOLOGNA

Transcript

1 La partecipazione italiana ai bandi NMBP in Horizon2020 Luisa TONDELLI Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) Area della Ricerca di BOLOGNA

2 HORIZON 2020 structure

3 Il programma NMBP (I) This part of the programme covers different areas : Nanotechnologies Advanced materials Advanced manufacturing and processing Industrial Biotechnology Activities of the work programme will address the whole innovation chain with technology readiness levels spanning the crucial range from medium levels to high levels preceding mass production, and helping to bridge the gaps ("valley of death") in this range.

4 Il programma NMBP (II) These activities will be based on research and innovation agendas defined by industry and business, together with the research community, and have a strong focus on leveraging private sector investment. For the higher technology readiness levels, dedicated support will therefore be provided for larger-scale pilot lines and demonstrator projects to facilitate industrial takeup and commercialisation. There will be a strong focus on the contribution of Key Enabling Technologies to societal challenges.

5 Calls NMBP : Budget Budget/ Calls Total Budget : 992,2 million PPP Sustainable Process Industries 13,5% Energy Efficient Buildings 11,5% ContribuFons to other programme (ICT/WASTE) NMP 1,8% 49,2% NMP 49,2% 1 2 EC funded 2014: 511 million EC funded 2015: 494 million 3 Factories of the Future 16% 7,9% BIOTECH 41% of the NMBP Budget for PPP

6 Calls NMBP 2014: RESULTS Partecipazione No. proposte presentate No. Proposte finanziate Tasso medio di successo % (tasso medio di successo del programma NMBP: 8%) Coordinamento No. Partecipanti italiani in proposte presentate No. Partecipanti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo partecipanti Italiani % No. Proposte presentate a coordinament o italiano No. Coordinamenti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo coordinatori Italiani Contributo finanziario per l Italia ES M (~10% del budget totale ) DE IT ,5% ~ 13% Progetti finanziati sono a Coordinamento Italiano EC funding

7 Calls NMBP 2015: RESULTS Partecipation No. Partecipanti italiani in proposte presentate No. Partecipanti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo partecipanti Italiani % Contributo finanziario per l Italia Coordination No. Proposte presentate a coordinament o italiano No. Coordinamenti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo coordinatori Italiani 45.7 M (~10.7% del budget totale ) %

8 NMBP WORK PROGRAMME

9 PPPs in NMBP EU funding for cppps in H2020 per country

10 PPPs in NMBP FoF EeB SPIRE % of EU funding to ITALY topics 2014 topics 2015 FoF 7 19 % % SPIRE 4 3% 4 9.6% EeB 4 10,0% 4 10%

11 2 stage evaluation - NMP Participation in retained proposals Year Topics IT Participants success rate* IT Coordinators success rate* % NMP funding % 57% 14.3% % 21% 10.3% IT DE UK 2014 EC funding ES DE UK 2015 EC funding * Success rate = selezionate / presentate

12 NMBP WP (& Focus Areas)

13 NMBP WP (Deadlines) DEADLINES 2017 CALLS Single stage evaluation EEB 20 Mar 2017 FOF, SPIRE 19 Jan 2017 Two stage evaluation NMBP & BIOTEC 27 Oct May

14 Calls NMBP WP : Budget Total Budget : 966,9 million Budget 2016: 447,2 million Budget 2017: 519,7 million Sustainable Process Industries 13,65% Energy Efficient Buildings 10.3% NMP NMP 49,2% Factories of the Future 15% BIOTECH % of the budget for NMP Calls 39% of the Budget for PPP

15 H2020 WP NMBP (annex H) Ø For the evaluation of first-stage proposals under a two-stage submission procedure, only the criteria excellence and impact will be evaluated. Within these criteria, only the aspects in bold will be considered. Ø The threshold for both individual criteria will be 4. Ø The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the two individual scores, will be set at the level such that the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 is as close as possible to three times the available budget. The actual level will therefore depend on the volume of proposals received. The threshold is expected to normally be set at 8 or 8.5.

16 NMBP 2016: 1 stage results Two stage evaluation Number of Proposals Topic Code Evaluated % Retained for Funding % Success Rate Reserve List NMBP ,0% 9 13,2% 36,0% 0 NMBP ,5% 6 8,8% 35,3% 0 NMBP ,3% 12 17,6% 32,4% 0 NMBP ,5% 8 11,8% 47,1% 0 NMBP ,4% 8 11,8% 13,3% 0 NMBP ,5% 13 19,1% 31,0% 0 NMBP ,8% 3 4,4% 75,0% 0 NMBP ,0% 4 5,9% 44,4% 0 NMBP ,0% 5 7,4% 31,3% 0 1 stage score 8,0 IT Coordinators: 11/22 Deadline 2 stage: 24 May 2016

17 1 stage BIOTEC 2016 (preliminary results) Number of Proposals Italian Coordination Topic Code Evaluated % Retained for Funding % Success Rate Reserve List Number Acronym BIOTEC Bioconversion of nonagricultural waste into biomolecules f o r industrial applications 47 61,8% 10 58,8% 21,3% COFFEE BREAK BioLC-Tech MADELINE BIOTEC Microbial c h a s s i s platforms with optimized metabolic pathways for industrial innovations through systems biology 29 38,2% 7 41,2% 24,1% IT Coordinators: 3/11 IT Participants: 25/209 - circa 12% 1 stage score 8,5

18 1 stage PILOT 2016 (preliminary results) Number of Proposals Italian Coordination Topic Code Evaluated % Retained for Funding % Success Rate Reserve List Number Acronym PILOTS ,8% 8 53,3% 29,6% PILOTS ,2% 7 46,7% 21,9% PILATEX TOTAL ,0% ,0% 25,4% IT Coordinators: 1/ 8 18

19 2016 NMBP calls and topics (single stage evaluation) NMBP WORK PROGRAMME Call H2020-EEB EEB EEB EEB EEB Call H2020-NMBP CSA topics 3 ERANET topics NMBP (GV) FOCUS AREA Call H2020-IND-CE FOF FOF FOF FOF FOF SPIRE SPIRE SPIRE SPIRE SPIRE SPIRE SINGLE STAGE TOPICS Deadline Evaluation: Feb-March

20 CSA topics Main List proposals - Country Requested funding by country Main List DE UK FR SE BE IT AT EL NL MT FI ES PT NO DK CH PL IL CY HR LT LU SI SK BG RO LV EE CZ HU IE

21 ERA-NET topics Proposals and requested EC funding Available budget: 30 M 3 eligible proposals requesting 27.6 M Retained proposals: 3 (27.6 M ) Topics Eligible Main list nb Funding nb EC funding BIOTEC (*) Biotechnologies 1 9,999, ,999,999 NMBP (*) Nanomedicine 1 5,449, ,449,125 NMBP (*) Manufacturing technologies supporting industry and SME 1 12,109, ,614,569 (*) only one action can be funded 21

22 ERA-NET topics % Requested funding by country Main List DE ES IT FR TR NO NL UK BE RO IL PT PL RU LV SI LU AT AR IE EE SK LT EL CY SE HR FI TW CA DK HU CZ BG MT 22

23 23 Energy Efficient Buildings (EEB)

24 EEB topics Overview Available budget: 49 M 58 eligible proposals requesting 247 M Retained proposals: 10 (44.6 M ) No. proposte presentate No. Proposte finanziate Tasso medio di successo % EEB EEB (*) EEB EEB Eligible Main list Topics nb Funding nb EC funding Highly efficient insulation materials ,311, ,474,133 Performance indicators and monitoring techniques 4 3,038, ,634 Integration of advanced technologies for heating and cooling 9 50,954, ,361,257 reuse and recycling of construction materials and structures 21 91,597, ,095,529 (*) only one action can be funded 24

25 EEB topics Main List proposals - Country 22% budget $ Requested funding by country Main List No. Partecipanti italiani in proposte presentate $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ No. Partecipanti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo partecipanti Italiani % No. Proposte presentate a coordinament o italiano No. Coordinamenti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo coordinatori Italiani % $ $ IT DE UK ES FR PL NL EL PT BE IL CZ SE RO HU AT SI BG CY IE FI DK HR LT EE CH SK TW LU MT LV

26 26 Factory of the Future (FOF)

27 FOF topics Overview No. proposte presentate No. Proposte finanziate Tasso medio di successo Available budget: 77 M 113 eligible received proposals requesting 511 M Retained proposals: 17 (74 M ) % FOF FOF FOF FOF FOF (*) Eligible Main list Topics nb Funding nb EC funding Additive and subtractive manufacturing machines ,611, ,511,435 novel embedded cognitive functions 20 94,509, ,490,146 Zero-defect strategies at system level for multi-stage manufacturing ,913, ,447,927 Continuous adaptation of work environments ,027, ,631,481 Support for the further development of Additive Manufacturing 3 3,041, ,053 (*) only one action can be funded 27

28 FOF topics Main List proposals - Country $ $ $ $ $ $ % budget Requested funding by country Main List No. Partecipanti italiani in proposte presentate No. Partecipanti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo partecipanti Italiani ,9% No. Proposte presentate a coordinament o italiano No. Coordinamenti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo coordinatori Italiani ,5% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ES IT UK DE FR EL AT SE FI NO PT BE IE CY LU DK RO PL RS TR NL CH SK CZ BG LT SI HU EE LV HR MT

29 29 Sustainable Process Industry (SPIRE)

30 SPIRE topics Overview No. proposte presentate No. Proposte finanziate Tasso medio di successo Available budget: 74 M 63 eligible proposals requesting 336 M Retained proposals: 14 (71.5 M ) % SPIRE SPIRE SPIRE Topics Eligible Main list nb Funding nb EC funding Resource-efficient water management systems 15 86,933, ,308,689 Plant-wide monitoring and control of data-intensive processes ,066, ,196,425 Valorisation of European bioresources 9 50,896, ,079,289 SPIRE Industrial furnace design 13 75,994, ,895,320 SPIRE (*) Potential use of CO2/ CO as feedstock 2 988, ,748 Business models for intensified SPIRE (*) processing 1 495, ,065 (*) only one action can be funded 30

31 SPIRE topics Main List proposals - Country $ $ Requested funding by country Main List 10% budget No. Partecipanti italiani in proposte presentate No. Partecipanti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo partecipanti Italiani ,9% $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ No. Proposte presentate a coordinament o italiano No. Coordinamenti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo coordinatori Italiani % 31 DE ES IT FR BE NL SE FI UK AT EL SI LU PL TR SK DK PT EE RO BG IE CZ LT CY HR CH MT LV HU

32 2016 EEB FOF SPIRE Partecipazione No. Partecipanti italiani in proposte presentate No. Partecipanti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo partecipanti Italiani ,9% Coordinamento No. Proposte presentate a coordinament o italiano No. Coordinamenti italiani finanziati Tasso di successo coordinatori Italiani ,5%

33 2016 EEB FOF SPIRE - countries $ ,00 $ ,00 Country parjcipajon EC Requested funding EEB: ,25 FOF: ,70 SPIRE: ,88 TOTALE 2016: $ ,00 $ ,00 $ ,00 DE ES IT $ ,00 EC funding $ ,00 SPIRE FOF EEB 33 $- ES DE IT UK FR EL BE SE NL FI AT PL PT NO SI LU RO CY DK IE TR IL CZ SK RS HU BG CH EE HR LT LV MT

34 PPPs in NMBP FoF EeB SPIRE % of EU funding to ITALY topics 2014 topics 2015 topics 2016 FoF 7 19 % % 5 16% SPIRE 4 3% 4 9.6% 6 10% EeB 4 10,0% 4 10% 4 22%

35 TOWARDS THE NMBP WP Stakeholder consultation* PPPs ETPs Advisory Group Final Work Programme Draft Work Programme PROGRAMME COMMITTEE EC Interservice Consultation *

36 Timeline for WP JUNE 2016 SEPT 2016 OCT 2016 OCT 2017

37 HORIZON 2020 Programme Committees

38 H2020: i delegati nazionali

39 H2020: referenti nazionali MIUR - RAPPRESENTANTI NAZIONALI PER I COMITATI DI PROGRAMMA ü competenza e impegno nel ruolo ü collaborazione con la struttura del MUR ü collaborazione con la rete dei NCP ü supporto nella elaborazione di strategie paese a sostegno della partecipazione al PQ ü partecipazione ai comitati di programma ü partecipazione alla consultazione in fase di elaborazione dei programmi di lavoro NATIONAL CONTACT POINT ü fornire informazioni sulle modalità di partecipazione al PQ ü fornire assistenza alla presentazione di progetti di ricerca ü assicurare una buona copertura geografica nello stato in cui opera ü assicurare il contatto con la Commissione e con gli omologhi negli altri Stati membri ü segnalare ad altre reti comunitarie (es. Enterprise Europe Network) quei potenziali partecipanti che hanno bisogno di assistenza (es. brevetti e/o trasferimento tecnologico)

40 Il ruolo delle delegazioni nazionali 1. RAPPRESENTARE GLI INTERESSI DEL PAESE IN EUROPA ü Sostiene temi su cui la partecipazione italiana può avere successo ü Rappresenta capacità e piani nazionali/regionali della ricerca e ü Consulta gli stakeholders nazionali ü Propone modifiche ai WP alla Commissione Europea ü Crea sinergie ed alleanze con le altre delegazioni 2. ACCRESCERE LA COMPETITIVITA DELL ITALIA ü Partecipa alla definizione del PNR in linea con H2020 ü Sostiene sinergie tra UE, MIUR, Regioni, Cluster tecnologici

41 National Contact Points (NCP) per NMBP Martina De Sole Serena Borgna

42 Delegazione Italiana NMBP H2020 Delegato nazionale MIUR: Donata Medaglini Rappresentante Italiana per il Comitato NMBP in H2020 Esperti nazionali MIUR: Elisa Molinari CNR NANO, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia Rappresentante IT nel Comitato NMP in FP7 Luisa Tondelli CNR Bologna Luisa Torsi Università di Bari Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico & Confindustria

43 WANTED: esperti valutatori e non solo! Gruppi di Esperti della CE index.cfm?do=calls.calls_for_app Esperti Nazionali Distaccati (END) TASK FORCE END del CNR:

44 GRAZIE MILLE PER L ATTENZIONE! Luisa Tondelli luisa.tondelli@cnr.it